King Charles III, a quiet diplomat, is stepping up
“Now Stop the State Visit for ‘Bully’ Trump,” The Mail on Sunday, a right-wing tabloid, said on its front page. It cited a chorus of demands by lawmakers and other critics that the Government rescind the invitation to Trump as a way to telegraph Britain’s displeasure with the President and solidarity with Ukraine.
Symbolically, Charles may have done the next best thing: hosting Zelenskyy at his estate, Sandringham, after the Ukrainian President attended a summit meeting Sunday devoted to his country. Buckingham Palace did not disclose what they talked about but said Zelenskyy was “warmly received” by Charles, who served him tea in Sandringham’s Saloon room.
For Trump’s critics, the icing on the cake came Monday, when Trudeau, whose country has come under sweeping US tariffs and has been coveted by Trump for annexation as the 51st state, made the pilgrimage to Sandringham to meet Charles. The King, of course, is also Canada’s ceremonial head of state.
Trudeau said in a social media post that they discussed “matters of importance to Canadians – including, above all, Canada’s sovereign and independent future”. Charles was silent, which frustrated some Canadian politicians, who argued that he should have publicly reaffirmed Canada’s sovereignty. Given his non-political role, that was not going to happen. But the symbolism of the sovereign, smiling as he greeted a Prime Minister whom Trump refers to as governor, was lost on no one.
“It’s been a really interesting week in British and royal diplomacy,” said Ed Owens, a royal historian. “People have talked about how this royal family has become a secret weapon for British diplomacy. We saw Keir Starmer wielding the King and the monarchy as such in his interactions with Trump.”
Owens said Trump’s well-established affection for the King and the royal family was an intangible factor that could stick in the back of the American President’s mind as he deals with Britain over Ukraine. Starmer has positioned himself as a bridge between Europe and the United States on the issue. And the President was plainly delighted by the invitation from Charles.
“A beautiful man, a wonderful man,” a beaming Trump told Starmer, from the same chair where he sat 24 hours later, as he chastised Zelenskyy, telling the Ukrainian President: “Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel. You’re in no position to dictate that.”
Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the status of the invitation to Trump, noting that the Government is in charge of such issues. Starmer brushed aside calls for the visit to be cancelled Sunday, saying in a BBC interview that critics were “trying to ramp up the rhetoric without really appreciating what is the single most important thing at stake here – we’re talking about peace in Europe”.
Two people with knowledge of the palace said it was highly unlikely that the invitation would be rescinded, given the ill will that would generate with the White House – though the challenge of matching the calendars of two heads of state could mean that the state visit does not take place for months, they added.
In his letter, the King broached the idea of Trump first seeing him in Scotland, where the President has a golf club, Trump Turnberry, and Charles has a castle, Balmoral, to make the arrangements for the state visit at a later time. The Scotland meeting would be more informal, without the honour guard and lavish banquet in Buckingham Palace that Trump enjoyed in his last state visit in 2019.
“The idea of it being indefinitely delayed until a peace agreement is reached, on terms that are acceptable to Ukraine and Europe, is interesting,” Owens said, adding that the royal family “has bought Britain influence within these negotiations that it might not have had otherwise”.
For all his adherence to the monarch’s non-political role, Charles is known to be more politically aware and opinionated than his late mother, Queen Elizabeth II. Early in his reign, he came under criticism for welcoming the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, to Windsor Castle, after she signed a deal on Northern Ireland with Rishi Sunak, who was then Britain’s Prime Minister.
Critics saw it as putting a royal imprimatur on the Government’s deal. They said that Charles, whose support of the European Union was well documented, had allowed himself to be used by Downing St.
The King has been demonstrative in his backing of Ukraine, issuing statements and making regular visits to relief organisations that help refugees from the war. Early in the conflict, when he was still Prince of Wales, he visited a group in London and spoke to a family that had been evacuated from Kharkiv, in eastern Ukraine.
“So, what do you think the aim of the Russians is?” Charles asked them. “Is it to remove people?”
Given the King’s strong feelings and the delicacy of the moment, royal watchers said the Government should be careful not to overextend what has so far been a beneficial role. His value as an agent of British “soft power,” they say, resides in his being above politics.
Even his long-planned visit to the aircraft carrier was symbolic, given Britain’s pledge to deploy troops to a peacekeeping force for Ukraine. The HMS Prince of Wales is in training exercises before deploying on an eight-month mission to Asia.
Speaking to crew members in his dress uniform, Charles could have been addressing Starmer, a relatively new Prime Minister, who has been struggling to calm the tempest between Ukraine and the United States.
“Your deployment in the next month comes amidst new challenges in an ever-changing and more unpredictable world,” the King said. “It will undoubtedly demand tenacity and determination, both at sea and for those you leave behind at home.”
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Mark Landler
Photographs by: Doug Mills
©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
