The bill would double the number of signatures needed to trigger a vote on Saskatchewan separating from Canada and also prevent the government from “unilaterally” calling a referendum.
Published May 07, 2025 • Last updated 3 minutes ago • 2 minute read
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
The official Opposition introduced the “Keep Saskatchewan in Canada Act,” which aims to amends current referendum and plebiscite legislation.Photo by KAYLE NEIS /Regina Leader-Post
Article content
Saskatchewan’s official Opposition has introduced a bill to make it tougher to trigger a referendum or plebiscite on the province separating from Canada.
On Wednesday morning, NDP Leader Carla Beck said the “Keep Saskatchewan in Canada Act” would increase the number of signatures needed for a citizen petition on a referendum from 15 per cent of the electorate to 30 per cent. It would also prevent government caucus from “unilaterally calling a referendum on separation,” according to Beck.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
The private member’s bill, introduced by the NDP Wednesday afternoon, would amend The Referendum and Plebiscite Act currently in effect.
The motivation for Bill 604 was, in part, borne out of concern for economic stability that may be at risk in the face of a referendum vote, Beck said, referencing capital flight from Quebec during secession referendums decades ago.
“This is a bill about protecting jobs, protecting investment and bringing stability back to our economy at a time of economic uncertainty, at a time when signals of stability are incredibly important,” said Beck.
“A referendum on separation would drive jobs and investments out of Saskatchewan even if that referendum were to fail.”
The current referendum language refers to signatures from “electors.” There were 829,884 eligible voters in the last provincial election.
Under the current formula, which requires signatures from 15 per cent of voters, 124,483 would be needed to trigger a referendum. The NDP’s proposed legislation would double that to 248,965.
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Speaking Tuesday before details of the bill were shared, Premier Scott Moe argued the NDP was seeking to disrupt the democratic process through the legislation.
“That’s wrong,” said Moe. “Silencing the very voters that you vie to represent is just plain out wrong.”
Beck emphasized the legislation would only apply to separation, adding that “no one will be kept from signing a petition.”
“People deserve to have a say,” said Beck, who noted that additional steps are needed in the context of separation. “The bar has to be set high. We’re not voting here on whether we change the provincial flower.”
Beck also explained that her party seeks to remove the ability of government caucus to initiate a referendum without a public mandate because of “real doubts about Scott Moe’s ability to control his caucus.”
Beck said she’d like to see the bill put to a free vote, not a whipped one, meaning MLA’s would vote according to their own personal beliefs instead of along party lines.
The move comes just a couple of days after Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s government tabled Bill 54, which is designed in part to lower the signature threshold for a citizen-triggered referendum and extend the timeline to get those signatures from 90 days to 120 days.
More to come …
Read More
Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe addresses separation, repeats call for a ‘united Canada’
Moe promotes “united Canada” but won’t condemn talk of Western separation, referendum